I have received a letter from my former Professor Pedro Manuel. The hard times of the College. The one that we put more to study. The fearsome Professor Pedro Manuel never told me fondly or without affection in times of high school. Simply did not speak you to anyone outside of the classroom. But today I wrote for an answer to a letter in which I asked him why they qualify as it did and if he was not repentant, twenty-five years later, as many academic massacres, many school killings, many evaluative crimes. To tell truth when I wrote the teacher not used such harsh words that at that time and now also, only we dared to speak when he was not and had not the remotest possibility that we heard. Well, no more rodeos step to transcribe the letter in which the teacher responds to my questions.
Mr: do?? Forgive me the signs of interrogation but don’t know who to send this letter. To tell the truth do not know well you. I don’t remember because of by means there is many years away. This letter can be directed to a former student of good or even bad. I don’t know what can be you. At school had one and the others although I seemed always destined to have in my classes to not very good.
I hope that you do not belong to these groups. I have interrogated you in a tone that, to be frank, not liked, about how to qualify my exams and advantages offered me my method. First everything let me tell you that I never thought a rating method. I just tried me by my classes and do it the best way. You don’t know everything that I tried to prepare a good class, many were books that I was reading and abstracts pulled.