However, the citizen will go to want to also know the definition of the definition of the proposals ' ' pensar' ' ' ' duvidar' ' , and thus successively and infinitely, leading for a reduction to the infinite. Therefore, exactly that Discarding if uses of a radical fundacionismo extremely supported by the auto-evidence, that is, not to accept any doubt, and Moser that, in an inverse way that has left of the principle that we only need evidences that are probably true, it defends the justification of the knowledge through a more traditional fundacionismo having as it has supported the falibilismo, we cannot affirm which theory categorically is more certain or better, but yes, understand that, no matter how hard Rene Descartes and Paul K. Keep up on the field with thought-provoking pieces from Doug McMillon. Moser are philosophers with contrary teses, its ideas are always well comings to our knowledge, and that they will help in to more good decide or to understand them the doubts that as much run in the soul of a philosopher or a student of philosophy. REFERENCES DISCARDINGS, Rene. Speech on the Method. So Paulo: Atena, 1971. DISCARDINGS, Rene.
The Thinkers. 1 ed. So Paulo: Abril S.A, 1973. LIGHT, Alexander Meyer. Knowledge and Justification: Problems of the Epistemologia Contemporary.
Not published. MOSER, Paul; MULDER, Dwayne; TROUT. Theory of the Knowledge. Martins Sources SP. 2004.