The compromised professionals of the education in fact must fight so that new curricular orientaes appear, where the multiculturalismo are present. Valley to stand out that, the professors need a differentiated teaching formation stop of this form, to place in fact in practical its ability multicultural where it circulates the different cultures freely. 2 – The IMPORTANCE OF the INTERPERSONAL RELATIONSHIP IN SUPERIOR EDUCATION Many professors of didactics of superior education speak in classroom in ' ' Sinergia' ' , and, so that this is possible to happen, it has the necessity of possible more productive interaction with the purpose to reach common objectives, where all involved ones are more than a simple addition of the parts. Constructing and desconstruindo, we have a permanent task that it is to learn, not only to teach ahead of the changes that occur in the current society. To give attention in the other, in its to know, difficulties, requires to know and to recognize the necessities where let us can change necessary subsidies to the performance.
Being thus, the interpersonal relation in superior education as goes if narrowing it grows on two sensible ones: practical and the theoretician (prxis), conceiving the confidence, the respect between team favoring the constitution as people. ' ' In this direction, the good professor is what obtains, while it speaks, to bring the pupil until the privacy of the movement of its thought. Its lesson is thus a challenge and not one ' ' cantiga of ninar' '. Its pupils tire, do not sleep. They tire because they follow gone and the comings of its thought, surprise its pauses, its doubts, its incertezas' '.
(FREIRE, 2010, P. 86). Through the considered dialogue one of the positions multicultural important so that if it obtains to promote discovered, democracy, autonomy and respect, we also identify that this depends very on the interpersonal relation annexed to the context of the interaction and shelter to the different referenciais, that the professor is opened to value these questions and to promote of this form the knowledge.
Still valley the penalty to designate that Wadsworth (1997, P. 74), supported in the piagetiana theory, it summarizes the characteristics of a child in the development of the concrete operations (7-11 years), in the scope of the affectivity. We know that the school is a necessary environment for the cognitivo and affective development, Capelatto (2002, p.8) says that ‘ ‘ the affectivity is the dynamics deepest in which the human being can have, and to give initiates at the moment where the love happens for another one. ‘ ‘ The school has as function to provide to the pupils possibilities to evolve as human beings; the pedagogical work must make with that the pupils fulfill rules, imposing itself limits. In this manner, Capelatto (2002, P. 14), alert for the fact of some schools to be worried only about the amount of contents, forgetting itself the affectivity, of the part human being: ‘ ‘ They are moved away thus from ‘ ‘ to be humano’ ‘ , treating the pupils are known only number by it of registro’ ‘ On the same concern, according to Ribeiro and Jutras (2006, p.39) ‘ ‘ the affective dimension contributes for the acquisition of positive attitudes in relation the professors, you discipline to them for given them and for the cognitiva learning of the pupils in room of aula’ ‘.
Recent Comments